🔍 Read the full analysis: The Promise Of AI Wealth For All, Measured Against Income Pilots on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on monitors, keyboards and dev gear
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
At Oracle AI World on Oct. 27, Larry Ellison said taxing value added by robots could eventually fund what he called “universal high income,” though he said the shift would take more than a decade. South Korea has a rural income pilot paying eligible residents 150,000 won a month in local vouchers through 2027, offering a current but limited example of recurring public payments. Evidence from other trials shows varied effects on work, while funding and price impacts remain central questions.
Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison said Oct. 27 that taxes on value created by robots could help pay for what he called “universal high income,” while South Korea is already testing monthly payments in rural counties. The proposal is not an Oracle policy plan, and the Korean program is a limited pilot, but the contrast puts a practical question behind the promise: how would public payments be funded if automation changes jobs and production?
Ellison made the remarks during a question-and-answer session at Oracle AI World in Las Vegas. Asked about economic models for a world with more robots and AI, he argued that governments should shift some taxation away from human labor and toward value added by machines. He said the change would take “more than a decade” and rejected predictions that AI would replace everyone as “kind of nonsensical.” His example was that automation could reduce the cost of a house if labor made up a large share of its construction cost.
The comments were reported by TechRadar, Diginomica and Business Standard; Oracle’s replay of the session requires an account, according to the source article. Ellison’s remarks describe an idea, not a priced or enacted proposal. Diginomica reported that robot-tax ideas are not an Oracle strategy and disclosed that Oracle is a partner. Ellison linked his proposal to Milton Friedman’s negative income tax, though that approach—payments that fall as recipients’ earnings rise—is distinct from a broad tax on value added.
South Korea’s agriculture ministry runs the rural basic income pilot. It pays 150,000 won a month, about $112 using Yonhap’s conversion, in local gift vouchers to eligible residents in 17 of 69 counties designated as losing population. The program began in February 2026 and is scheduled to continue through 2027. In 2026, the national government pays 40% of the cost, with the province and county each covering 30%. A ministry proposal for 2027 would change the shares to 50%, 25% and 25%, respectively, and add about 18 counties; those changes depend on a parliamentary budget vote.
Infographic 01 · Two ideas of a basic income
A promise for the future, a test running now
What Oracle’s co-founder proposed on stage, and how South Korea’s rural basic income actually works and who funds it.
The promise
Larry Ellison, Oracle AI World, Las Vegas, 27 Oct 2026 (as reported)
- Robots build a house: if labor was 80% of the cost, the house gets 80% cheaper
- Change from taxing human labor to taxing value added
- Tax what robots add, fund a “universal high income”
- AI replacing everyone is “kind of nonsensical”
- No amounts, no costing, “more than a decade”
“We need to change from taxing human labor to taxing value added.”Larry Ellison, as quoted by TechRadar, Diginomica and Business Standard
The test
South Korea’s rural basic income pilot, 2026–2027
- Every citizen registered and living in a pilot county for 30+ days
- No means test, no job requirement; newcomers wait 90 days
- Paid as a local gift voucher (card or phone), not cash
- Expires after 3 months (towns) or 6 months (townships)
- Max ₩50,000 at gas stations, convenience stores, co-op supermarkets
- 10 counties from February, 7 more from 28 August; about 18 more planned for 2027
Who pays in 2026
Share of the ₩150,000 base payment
Proposed for 2027
Ministry’s budget proposal; parliament decides
Some counties add their own money: Gurye, Boseong and Cheongsong pay ₩200,000, Boeun ₩160,000 (ministry, 25 Aug). The ministry puts the total cost of the 2026–27 pilot at about ₩3.09 trillion.
Sources: TechRadar, 30 Oct · Diginomica, 27 Oct · Business Standard, 28 Oct · Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs: MAFRA, 10 Feb, 11 Jun, 25 Aug, 8 Oct 2026.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Who Would Fund AI-Era Payments?
The comparison matters because a promise of broadly shared gains from automation is not the same as a working funding model. Ellison’s proposal raises questions about who owns productive machines, which activities would be taxed, and whether the resulting revenue could support payments at a national scale. The Korean pilot, by contrast, shows a government making recurring payments now, but its funding is divided among levels of government and its reach is limited to selected rural counties.
Existing trials offer some evidence about how recipients respond, but they do not settle the question of a permanent income program financed by automation. The source reports that a US OpenResearch study found $1,000 monthly payments reduced recipients’ earnings by about $1,900 a year and work by one to two hours a week; Finland’s trial had little effect on employment, while participants in Kenya shifted from wage work toward their own businesses. These results come from different programs and settings, so they should not be treated as a single forecast for an AI-funded scheme.
The scale is also significant. The source author estimates that paying every US adult $1,000 a month would cost about $3.1 trillion annually, compared with $5.40 trillion in federal receipts in fiscal 2026. That is the author’s calculation, not an official cost estimate, and it does not specify a financing plan. An International Labour Organization research brief cited in the source warns that additional spending could raise prices in areas where supply does not expand with AI, including housing and care.
Products Worth Considering
Bose SoundLink Flex (2nd Gen) Portable Bluetooth Speaker, Black
Logitech MX Brio Ultra HD 4K Webcam, Graphite
Apple MacBook Air 15-inch (2026) with M5 chip, 16GB memory, 512GB SSD, Silver
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A Rural Pilot, Not a National Guarantee
South Korea’s program has eligibility rules rather than universal national coverage. According to the source’s account of agriculture ministry releases, recipients must be Korean citizens registered and actually living in a pilot county for at least 30 days before applying. There is no means test or job requirement. People who work or study elsewhere must spend at least three days a week living in the county. The source material cuts off while describing rules for newcomers, so their full payment conditions are not available here.
The policy tool Ellison named is also broader than a tax on robots alone. A value-added tax is generally collected as goods and services gain value at successive stages. The OECD says the United States is the only OECD country that uses a retail sales tax, rather than a VAT, as its main consumption tax; US sales taxes are set by state and local governments. Ellison’s proposal is distinctive not because value-added taxation is new, but because he suggested using a tax base tied to machine-generated value to finance high payments.
Other technology leaders have raised related proposals. The source notes that Sam Altman’s 2021 essay, “Moore’s Law for Everything,” argued for taxing capital and land rather than labor, and that Elon Musk has also discussed broad income payments. Those are precedents for the debate, not evidence that governments have adopted a common policy or agreed on how to pay for it.
““We need to change from taxing human labor to taxing value added.””
— Larry Ellison, at Oracle AI World on Oct. 27, as reported by TechRadar and Diginomica
The Tax Base and Costs Remain Open
Ellison did not specify a tax rate, the activities or firms that would be covered, how revenue would be distributed, or how payments would change with income. The proposal’s feasibility at the level of “universal high income” is therefore not established. The source also gives no official cost estimate for such a program, and its US spending comparison is the author’s arithmetic rather than a government projection.
South Korea’s next-year expansion and funding shares are not settled: the ministry proposal depends on parliament’s budget decision. The source material does not provide evaluation results from the pilot, so its effects on residents, local businesses, employment or population retention remain unclear. Nor do the other cash trials establish what would happen if payments were permanent, nationwide and financed by taxes on automation.
Price effects are another open issue. The ILO warning cited by the source concerns areas where supply may not rise alongside purchasing power, but the material does not quantify how large any price changes would be. The full eligibility rules for newcomers are also missing from the supplied account.
Budget Vote and Pilot Results
The nearest policy milestone is South Korea’s decision on the 2027 budget. If parliament approves the agriculture ministry’s proposal, the government would shift the funding shares and add about 18 counties. Until that vote, the proposed expansion and cost split should not be described as final.
The pilot is scheduled to run through 2027. Further ministry releases or evaluations may clarify how payments affect household finances, work and local economies, but the source material does not give a date for findings. For Ellison’s proposal, the next steps would be political and technical debate over what counts as robot-generated value, how it would be taxed and how payments would be calculated. No such plan was announced at the Oracle event.
Key Questions
What did Larry Ellison propose?
He said governments could shift taxation from human labor toward value added by robots and use the revenue to fund what he called “universal high income.” He said the change would take more than a decade and did not offer a detailed or costed plan.
How much does South Korea’s pilot pay?
Eligible residents receive 150,000 won per month in local gift vouchers, about $112 using Yonhap’s conversion as cited in the source. The pilot began in February 2026 and is scheduled to run through 2027.
Who pays for South Korea’s pilot?
For 2026, the national government covers 40% of the cost, while the province and county each cover 30%. A proposed 2027 split of 50%, 25% and 25%, along with an expansion to about 18 more counties, awaits a parliamentary budget vote.
Do cash-payment trials show that recipients stop working?
No single result applies across all trials. The source reports modest reductions in earnings and weekly work in the US OpenResearch study, little employment change in Finland, and a shift from wage work toward self-employment in Kenya. These findings do not determine the effects of a permanent, broadly funded program.
Is Ellison’s proposal an Oracle policy?
No. The source says Diginomica reported that robot-tax ideas are not an Oracle strategy. Ellison’s remarks were a discussion of a possible economic model, not an announced corporate or government policy.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
